<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Amit Singhal&#8217;s Post About Google Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegreatestinternetsalesman.com/2008-07-googles-amit-singhals-post-about-google-rankings.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegreatestinternetsalesman.com/2008-07-googles-amit-singhals-post-about-google-rankings.html</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and money making secrets revealed</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: app</title>
		<link>http://www.thegreatestinternetsalesman.com/2008-07-googles-amit-singhals-post-about-google-rankings.html#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>app</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegreatestinternetsalesman.com/?p=51#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I would say that deliberately changing the algorithm so that nobody that has a domain name with a certain particular TLD can achieve a PR above 1 regardless of the popularity and quality of their site, would qualify as "human intervention", in some respect...no? I think it would also qualify as a type of discrimination, as well.

How else do you explain the fact that all .tk domain names were busted down, whether they deserved a decrease in rank or not?

When my respectable 3 year old site that was a PR4 gets dropped to a PR1  overnight, for no good reason, along with every other .tk site, then something was tampered with by a human, in some way, to cause it. 

So this "no human intervention" stuff that is being spewed is lies &#38; crap.

Some group of people behind closed doors at Google decided that every site of a particular TLD is worthless and took actions that resulted in the drop in rank for all of them.

I am just glad they decided to do it before I plunked down the money to pay for the domain name for the next 9 years. I would have been even more upset if they did it after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that deliberately changing the algorithm so that nobody that has a domain name with a certain particular TLD can achieve a PR above 1 regardless of the popularity and quality of their site, would qualify as &#8220;human intervention&#8221;, in some respect&#8230;no? I think it would also qualify as a type of discrimination, as well.</p>
<p>How else do you explain the fact that all .tk domain names were busted down, whether they deserved a decrease in rank or not?</p>
<p>When my respectable 3 year old site that was a PR4 gets dropped to a PR1  overnight, for no good reason, along with every other .tk site, then something was tampered with by a human, in some way, to cause it. </p>
<p>So this &#8220;no human intervention&#8221; stuff that is being spewed is lies &amp; crap.</p>
<p>Some group of people behind closed doors at Google decided that every site of a particular TLD is worthless and took actions that resulted in the drop in rank for all of them.</p>
<p>I am just glad they decided to do it before I plunked down the money to pay for the domain name for the next 9 years. I would have been even more upset if they did it after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gecko</title>
		<link>http://www.thegreatestinternetsalesman.com/2008-07-googles-amit-singhals-post-about-google-rankings.html#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Gecko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegreatestinternetsalesman.com/?p=51#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Very interesting point. I was reading about Amit's post on digg and found your site. They certainly do some human intervention, the question is how much. I agree with you on most of this article points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting point. I was reading about Amit&#8217;s post on digg and found your site. They certainly do some human intervention, the question is how much. I agree with you on most of this article points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
